top of page
 'LEFTOVERS' IN THE CITY

I would like to think that in the future the profession of landscape architecture will expand. This would mean knowing a great deal about land, its uses, its values, and the political and economic and cultural forces affecting its distribution. It is finally a matter of defining landscape in a way that includes both the mobility of the vernacular and the political infrastructure of a stable social order. We derive our identity from our relationship with other people, and when we talk about the importance of place, the necessity of belonging to a place, let us be clear that in Landscape Three place means the people in it, not simply the natural environment.’  ("Concluding with Landscapes - J.B. Jackson"  2008)

There are some odd spaces exist as a kind of conceptual art in the city.  Those leftover spaces have no function and in a state of suspension. The city turns out a weird phenomenon that no

one starts to question their identity. The models unpack the
idea of  'the third landscape' and shape out the possibility
of the future of the space. Also they involve the
in-between relationship of
absence and presence,
past and present,
human and environment.

CITY BECOMES THE 'LEFTOVER'

Space doesn't form spatial gesture unless people interact with or within it.

bottom of page